友情链接
- Copyright © Science and Technology Daily, All Rights Reserved
- 科技日报社 中国科技网 版权所有
Recently, U.S. Senator Rick Scott, chairman of the Senate Special Committee on Aging, and Senator Dave McCormick sent a letter to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr, alleging that Chinese-linked wearable health devices pose data privacy risks and raise national security concerns. The senators urged the FCC to investigate such products and consider whether they should be added to the agency's Covered List of prohibited equipment.
Carbon emissions lead to climate change, which in turn has a significant impact on biodiversity. In recent years, China has achieved dual success in reducing carbon emissions and protecting biodiversity.
The allegations that China manipulates U.S. policy and public opinion on data centers are nothing more than irresponsible speculation and unfounded accusations.
Recently, U.S. Senate Aging Committee Chairman Rick Scott and Senator Dave McCormick sent a letter to FCC Chairman Brendan Carr. They falsely claimed that China-linked wearable health devices pose data privacy risks, and demanded the FCC investigate and consider placing such devices on a "regulated list."
China has seen marked improvements in its ecological environment, continuous breakthroughs in sci-tech innovation, and sustained enhancement of people's living standards in its recent past, something which hasn't gone unnoticed by foreign officials, representatives, and scholars visiting the country, who believe other nations could take a leaf out of China's book.
Science magazine has reported that in May, several members of the U.S. Congress introduced the Securing Innovation and Research from Adversaries (SIRA) Act, a bill that would prohibit U.S. researchers from using federal funds to collaborate with "blacklisted" Chinese entities. These include Chinese institutions and individuals. Joint research projects, co-authored papers, data sharing, personnel exchanges, and even the co-supervision of students would all be prohibited.
U.S. Senator Tom Cotton recently requested a DOJ investigation into alleged Chinese manipulation of U.S. data center policies and public opinion. At the same time, OpenAI released a report alleging that suspected Chinese accounts have been fueling anti-data center narratives on social media.
From both the commercial and global governance perspectives, moves to restrict U.S. biotech investment in China are shortsighted and extremely unwise, reflecting an overreach of national security rhetoric among certain U.S. politicians who politicize normal commercial cooperation.
China has made steady progress in protecting its ecosystem. Over the past decade, the ecological management of rivers, lakes and seas has evolved from concept to systematic practice.
Several members of the U.S. Congress have introduced a stringent bill, the Securing Innovation and Research from Adversaries(SIRA)Act.
The EU's "three-supplier rule" is blatant protectionism cloaked in "supply chain security" and yet another example of the politicization and securitization of economic and trade issues.
The European Commission has decided to bar EU-funded solar, wind, and energy storage projects from using Chinese-made inverters, citing alleged cybersecurity concerns, according to recent Western media reports.
Funding for China's Young Scientists Fund (Category C) is set to increase by over 50 percent year on year, with an expected addition of 12,000 projects. This move, announced by the National Natural Science Foundation of China on May 13, will provide a continuous pipeline of reserve skilled personnel for basic research.
Recently, China's diplomatic momentum has been on a steady rising trajectory. From major Western powers to global South nations, and from neighboring countries to transoceanic partners, the frequency of China's diplomatic engagements knows no bounds. The country's cooperation has become indispensable on the world stage, and the advantages it provides have emerged as a valuable and scarce public good in today's international community.
Recently, John Moolenaar, chairman of the House Select Committee on China, urged the U.S. Treasury to add biotech as a prohibited technology under the Comprehensive Outbound Investment National Security Act of 2025, aiming to limit American investment in China's biotech sector. But here's why that might backfire!
Chinese AI tech companies have moved ahead of U.S. rivals in video generation.
Since the beginning of this year, China's optical fiber industry has witnessed a rare simultaneous rise in both prices and output.
On May 14, Anthropic, a U.S. artificial intelligence (AI) company, released a policy paper that was inexplicably ill-timed. Rather than advocating dialogue and cooperation between China and the U.S. on AI, Anthropic instead advised Washington to adopt tougher measures to slow down China's AI development.
The EU is to roll out a so-called "three-supplier" rule, forcing companies to cap any single supplier at about 30% to 40% of components and source the rest from at least three different countries. This is a classic case of shooting oneself in the foot.
Recently, the U.S. has taken new action targeting China's automotive industry. More than 70 Democratic members of the House of Representatives cosigned a letter to President Donald Trump on April 28, citing the need to protect national security, data and American jobs, and urging the administration to block Chinese automakers from building factories or selling vehicles in the U.S.
Chinese President Xi Jinping has sent a congratulatory letter to the Science and Technology Daily on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of its founding.
The Shuanglin K7, a pioneer driverless electric-powered mining truck, recently made its debut in Shanghai. Equipped with a Level 4 autonomous driving system and boasting outstanding maneuverability, the 248-tonne vehicle is capable of moving sideways like a crab and performing in-situ U-turns.
