友情链接
- Copyright © Science and Technology Daily, All Rights Reserved
- 科技日报社 中国科技网 版权所有
From both the commercial and global governance perspectives, moves to restrict U.S. biotech investment in China are shortsighted and extremely unwise, reflecting an overreach of national security rhetoric among certain U.S. politicians who politicize normal commercial cooperation.
China has made steady progress in protecting its ecosystem. Over the past decade, the ecological management of rivers, lakes and seas has evolved from concept to systematic practice.
Several members of the U.S. Congress have introduced a stringent bill, the Securing Innovation and Research from Adversaries(SIRA)Act.
The EU's "three-supplier rule" is blatant protectionism cloaked in "supply chain security" and yet another example of the politicization and securitization of economic and trade issues.
The European Commission has decided to bar EU-funded solar, wind, and energy storage projects from using Chinese-made inverters, citing alleged cybersecurity concerns, according to recent Western media reports.
Funding for China's Young Scientists Fund (Category C) is set to increase by over 50 percent year on year, with an expected addition of 12,000 projects. This move, announced by the National Natural Science Foundation of China on May 13, will provide a continuous pipeline of reserve skilled personnel for basic research.
Recently, China's diplomatic momentum has been on a steady rising trajectory. From major Western powers to global South nations, and from neighboring countries to transoceanic partners, the frequency of China's diplomatic engagements knows no bounds. The country's cooperation has become indispensable on the world stage, and the advantages it provides have emerged as a valuable and scarce public good in today's international community.
Recently, John Moolenaar, chairman of the House Select Committee on China, urged the U.S. Treasury to add biotech as a prohibited technology under the Comprehensive Outbound Investment National Security Act of 2025, aiming to limit American investment in China's biotech sector. But here's why that might backfire!
Chinese AI tech companies have moved ahead of U.S. rivals in video generation.
Since the beginning of this year, China's optical fiber industry has witnessed a rare simultaneous rise in both prices and output.
On May 14, Anthropic, a U.S. artificial intelligence (AI) company, released a policy paper that was inexplicably ill-timed. Rather than advocating dialogue and cooperation between China and the U.S. on AI, Anthropic instead advised Washington to adopt tougher measures to slow down China's AI development.
The EU is to roll out a so-called "three-supplier" rule, forcing companies to cap any single supplier at about 30% to 40% of components and source the rest from at least three different countries. This is a classic case of shooting oneself in the foot.
Recently, the U.S. has taken new action targeting China's automotive industry. More than 70 Democratic members of the House of Representatives cosigned a letter to President Donald Trump on April 28, citing the need to protect national security, data and American jobs, and urging the administration to block Chinese automakers from building factories or selling vehicles in the U.S.
In 2025, an impressive 972,000 new invention patents were granted in China, making the country the first in the world to have over five million valid invention patents. Currently, China holds approximately 60 percent of global AI patents and about two-thirds of robot-related patents.
Recently, "agents" and "tokens" have gained popularity, especially in open-source AI projects, where they are giving rise to new business models and market opportunities. As this technological trend continues, China's large model technology has made exponential progress and its applications are rapidly expanding. This is refreshing the intelligent economy and gradually becoming the cornerstone of global innovation.
The so-called "China Shock 2.0" is neither objective nor fact-based. It stems from a biased zero-sum mindset and is underpinned by trade protectionism.
China has implemented an expanded policy — to remove tariffs on all imports from the 53 countries on the continent with which China has diplomatic ties, until April 30, 2028.
On May 14, US AI giant Anthropic released a policyarticle claiming that by tightening export controls on chips shipped to China and adopting other measures, the U.S.may be possible to lock in a 12-24 month lead in AI by 2028. Such well-crafted statements are essentially aimed at safeguarding its own commercial interests.
According to a recent Reuters report, the U.S. State Department has instructed its missions worldwide to amplify claims that Chinese companies "steal" U.S. AI intellectual property through so-called "distillation," laying the groundwork for potential follow-up actions and coordinated international messaging by Washington.
According to foreign media reports, the European Commission has decided to prohibit EU-funded energy projects from using Chinese inverters, citing "cybersecurity risks."
Chinese President Xi Jinping has sent a congratulatory letter to the Science and Technology Daily on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of its founding.
Under the theme "Media Convergence for Shared Growth: Opening a New Chapter in the ASEAN-China Comprehensive Strategic Partnership," the 2026 ASEAN-China Media Cooperation Forum was held on June 9 in Shenyang, northeast China's Liaoning province. Now in its ninth year, the forum aims to establish a strong rapport between China and ASEAN, invigorate international communication, and advance cross-border media collaboration.
